Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Genevieve Morton v. Twitter, Inc., et al
as 23-55732
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GENEVIEVE MORTON, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
TWITTER, INC., a Delaware Corporation
Defendant:
SPYIRL.COM, TWITTER INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, TWEETDECK, INC., a Delaware Corporation and others
Morton v. Gaines
as 2:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Paris Morton
Defendant:
Kiseana Gaines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Morton v. Critterden
as 2:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
Paris Morton
Defendant:
James E. Critterden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
In Re: DMCA Section 512 (h) Subpoena to Twitter, Inc.
as 5:2022mc00008
Petitioner:
Genevieve Morton
In Re:
DMCA Section 512 (h) Subpoena to Twitter, Inc.
Respondent:
Twitter, Inc.
Genevieve Morton v. Twitter, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv01482
Plaintiff:
Genevieve Morton
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc. and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Genevieve Morton v. Kyle Schuldt et al
as 2:2022cv02860
Plaintiff:
Genevieve Morton
Defendant:
Kyle Schuldt
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0106 Motion Pictures & Other Audiovisual Works
In Re: DMCA 512(h)Subpoena to Twitter, Inc.
as 2:2022mc00012
Petitioner:
Genevieve Morton
In Re:
DMCA 512(h) Subpoena to Twitter, Inc.
Genevieve Morton v. Twitter, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv07145
Plaintiff:
Genevieve Morton
Defendant:
TWITTER, INC., a Delaware Corporation, TWITTER INERNATIONAL COMPANY,, TWEETDECK, INC., a Delaware Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
St Andrews Links Limited v. Source and Design International (UK) Ltd et al
as 4:2021cv06470
Plaintiff:
St Andrews Links Limited
Defendant:
Source and Design International (UK) Ltd and John Charles Morton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Genevieve Morton v. Twitter, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv10434
Plaintiff:
Genevieve Morton
Defendant:
Does 1-100, Twitter, Inc. and SpyIRL.com
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
