Cases 1 - 10 of 60
CREIGHTON E MILLER v. AMERICAN TRADING & PRODUCTION CORP et al
as 2:2011cv66338
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
AMERICAN TRADING & PRODUCTION CORP , MARINE TRANSPORT LINES INC , MYSTIC STEAMSHIP CORP. and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
A P GREEN INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC, BABCOCK & WILCOX CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FELICIANO v. A. H. BULL AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv37901
Plaintiff:
INOCENCIO FELICIANO
Defendant:
A. H. BULL AND COMPANY, AMERICAN EXPORT ISBRANDTSEN , AMERICAN EXPORT LINES, INCORPORATED and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
CHIQUITA BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, FARRELL LINES, INCORPORATED and ARCO MARINE, INCORPORATED
Thirdparty_defendant:
A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED , ACANDS, INCORPORATED , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
AGOSTO v. AMERICAN EXPORT LINES, INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2010cv37904
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO AGOSTO
Defendant:
AMERICAN EXPORT LINES, INCORPORATED, GRACE LINES/PRUDENTIAL LINES, GRAND LINES and others
Cross_claimant:
SEA-LAND SERVICE, INCORPORATED
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
FARRELL LINES INC , SEA-LAND SERVICE, INCORPORATED and CHIQUITA BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED
Thirdparty_defendant:
A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED , BABCOCK AND WILCOX COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BARTEL et al v. AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LIMITED et al
as 2:2010cv37927
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LIMITED , BLIDBERG ROTHCHILD AGENCY CORPORATION, BULK FOOD CARRIERS, INCORPORATED and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
WEYERHAEUSER , QUAKER LINE , MATSON NAVIGATION COMPANY, INCORPORATED and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED , ACANDS, INCORPORATED , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
APONTE v. AGWIC LINES et al
as 2:2010cv37913
Plaintiff:
JORGE L. APONTE
Defendant:
AGWIC LINES, CHARLES KURZ AND COMPANY, INCORPORATED , GRACE LINES/PRUDENTIAL LINES and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
TEXACO INC. , FARRELL LINES INC. , SEA-LAND SERVICE, INCORPORATED and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPANSATION FUND , GAF CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MILLER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv37835
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A P GREEN INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED , ACMC and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
CRANE COMPANY , MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, UNITED STATES GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SCREEN v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv70661
Plaintiff:
THOMAS A SCREEN, SR, THOMAS A SCREEN, SR, THOMAS A SCREEN, SR and others
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SCREEN v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv70662
Plaintiff:
THOMAS A SCREEN, SR, THOMAS A SCREEN, SR, THOMAS A SCREEN, SR and others
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
YOUNG v. AC & S INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2009cv64642
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R. YOUNG
Defendant:
AC & S INCORPORATED, THE ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, A P GREEN INDUSTRIES INCORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
FACTORAN et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv66192
Plaintiff:
ELEAN G. FACTORAN, YOLANDA F. SANTOS, RICARDO G. FACTORAN and others
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, AMERICAN ASBESTOS COMPANY, THE ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
