Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Williams et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv03581
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams, Lucy Parsons Labs, Daniel Ortiz and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago, David O'Neal Brown, Nicholas Evangelides and others
Petitioner:
SoundThinking, Inc.
In Re: Tepezza Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2023cv03568
In Re:
TEPEZZA MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
Daniel Weibel, Lisa Christian Nethery, Donna Walker and others
Defendant:
Horizon Therapeutics USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Garcia et al v. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv03322
Plaintiff:
Al. H., Jennifer Zuniga, Consuelo Diana Perez and others
Defendant:
Unknown Pesticide Applicator #1, Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., Corteva, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1854
Walter D. Perez, M.D., S.C. v. D Drops Company Inc.,The
as 1:2020cv05805
Defendant:
The D Drops Company Inc. and D Drops Company Inc., The
Plaintiff:
Walter D. Perez, M.D., S.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04619
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04332
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02882
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
