Other Statutes Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
A. Philip Randolph Inst. of OH, et al v. Frank LaRose
as 20-4068
Plaintiff / Appellee: SOLI COLLINS, C. ELLEN CONNALLY, SARAH RIKLEEN and others
Defendant: FRANK LAROSE, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Ohio
Intervenor: NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE, OHIO REPUBLICAN PARTY, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and others
A. Philip Randolph Inst. of OH, et al v. Frank LaRose
as 20-4063
Intervenor: OHIO REPUBLICAN PARTY, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: SOLI COLLINS, C. ELLEN CONNALLY, SARAH RIKLEEN and others
Amicus Curiae: CITY OF COLUMBUS, OH, CITY OF CINCINNATI, OH, CITY OF AKRON, OH and others
Defendant / Appellant: FRANK LAROSE, in his official capacity as Secreatary of State of Ohio and FRANK LAROSE, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Ohio
Memphis A.PhillipRandolphInst, et al v. Tre Hargett, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-6141
Plaintiff / Appellee: THE TENNESSEE STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, SEKOU FRANKLIN, MEMPHIS AND WEST TENNESSEE AFL-CIO CENTRAL LABOR COUNCIL and others
Defendant / Appellant: TRE HARGETT, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of the State of Tennessee, MARK GOINS, in his official capacity as Coordinator of Elections for the State of Tennessee and AMY P. WEIRICH, in her official capacity as District Attorney General for Shelby County, Tennessee
Plaintiff: KENDRA LEE
Priorities USA, et al v. Dana Nessel We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1940
Plaintiff / Appellee: RISE, INC., PRIORITIES USA and DETROIT/DOWNRIVER CHAPTER OF THE A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE
Defendant: DANA NESSEL
Intervenor: MICHIGAN REPUBLICAN PARTY, MICHIGAN HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, MICHIGAN SENATE and others
Priorities USA, et al v. Dana Nessel We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1931
Plaintiff / Appellee: RISE, INC., PRIORITIES USA and DETROIT/DOWNRIVER CHAPTER OF THE A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE
Defendant: DANA NESSEL
Intervenor: MICHIGAN HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, MICHIGAN REPUBLICAN PARTY and others
Amicus Curiae: JOSHUA A. DOUGLAS, NICHOLAS STEPHANOPOULOS, JUSTIN LEVITT and others
Memphis A.Philip Randolph Inst, et al v. Tre Hargett, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-6046
Defendant / Appellee: MARK GOINS, AMY P. WEIRICH and TRE HARGETT
Plaintiff / Appellant: THE EQUITY ALLIANCE, SEKOU FRANKLIN, MEMPHIS A. PHILLIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE and others
Plaintiff: KENDRA LEE
Ohio A. Philip Randolph Inst, et al v. Larry Obhof, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-3551
Petitioner / Appellant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and ADAM KINCAID
Plaintiff / Appellee: NORTHEAST OHIO YOUNG BLACK DEMOCRATS, SARAH INSKEEP, KATHRYN DEITSCH and others
Defendant: FRANK LAROSE, Secretary of the State of Ohio, LARRY HOUSEHOLDER, Speaker of the Ohio House of Representatives and LARRY OBHOF, President of the Ohio Senate
Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute et al v. Smith et al
as 1:2018mc00116
Plaintiff: Linda Goldenhar, Beth Hutton, Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute and others
Defendant: Larry Obhof, Ryan Smith and Jon Husted
Intervenor: Dave Joyce, Robert F, Bodi, Bill Johnson and others
Petitioner: Armond D Budish and Christopher Glassburn
SUBPOENA SERVED ON E. MARK BRADEN
as 1:2018mc00029
Respondent: Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute, Cynthia Libster, League of Women Voters of Ohio and others
In Re: SUBPOENA SERVED ON E. MARK BRADEN
Petitioner: E. Mark Braden and Ohio Attorney General
SUBPOENA SERVED ON E. MARK BRADEN et al
as 1:2018mc00032
Respondent: Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute, Cynthia Libster, League of Women Voters of Ohio and others
Petitioner: E. Mark Braden
In Re: SUBPOENA SERVED ON E. MARK BRADEN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?