Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Randolph v. Dzurendas
as 2:2024cv00106
Petitioner:
Louis Randolph and Clyde Lewis
Respondent:
James Dzurenda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pattison v. Lombardo et al.
as 3:2022cv00537
Plaintiff:
Dante H. Pattison
Defendant:
Sheriff Joe Lombardo, Brian Sandoval, Steve Sisolak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2019cv01729
Plaintiff:
Clyde Lewis and Louis Randolph
Defendant:
M. Travis, James Dzurenda, Timothy Filson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broomfield v. Aranas et al
as 3:2018cv00313
Defendant:
Brian Ward, Lisa Walsh, Ashley Randolph and others
Plaintiff:
Steven City Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. Baker et al
as 2:2018cv00449
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Renee Baker
Petitioner:
Roger Randolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Randolph v. Carrasco et al
as 3:2017cv00506
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Carrasco, C/O Dalton and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Aranas et al
as 3:2017cv00169
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Candice Brockway and Ashley Randolph
Plaintiff:
Donald Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randolph v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00085
Defendant:
Dreesen, Harris, Justin and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randolph v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv00381
Defendant:
Dreesen, Harris, Justin and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randolph v. Cox, et al.
as 3:2016cv00468
Defendant:
Byrne, Tara Carpenter, James Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
