Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Brannan v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Jim C Brannan
Defendant:
Mike Smith, Zachary Robinson, FNU Farrer and others
Not Yet Classified:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Gill et al
as 2:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Eric Ison Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Sim Gill, Brett Robinson and Tyson V. Hamilton
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shields v. Robinson et al
as 4:2019cv00072
Plaintiff:
Adam D. Shields
Defendant:
Sean Casey, Blake Hunsaker, Jeremy Etherington and others
Not Yet Classified:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pirela v. Robinson
as 2:2018cv00323
Petitioner:
Edwin Mitchell Pirela
Defendant:
Michael Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stein v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2017cv00986
Plaintiff:
Richard Norman Stein
Defendant:
State of Utah, McKay Dee Hospital, FNU Summers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ritterbush v. Turley et al
as 2:2017cv00845
Defendant:
Kevin Tucker, Joe Hughes, Michael Robinson and others
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Plaintiff:
Lyndal D Ritterbush and Lyndal D. Ritterbush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. USA
as 2:2017cv00061
Petitioner:
Glenn Dee Robinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Robinson v. USA
as 2:2016cv00737
Petitioner:
Robbie Lynn Robinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Robinson v. USA
as 2:2016cv00606
Petitioner:
Michael Adam Robinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Baker v. Intermountain Specialized Abuse Treatment Center et al
as 2:2016cv00399
Plaintiff:
Robert Baker
Defendant:
Intermountain Specialized Abuse Treatment Center, Michael Robinson, Jeremy Etherington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
