Cases 31 - 40 of 258
Patino Orozco v. Garland
as 21-1084
Petitioner:
HIGINIA PATINO OROZCO, ESPERANZA SOLIS PATINO, KARLA ITAMAR SAVALE ALCAZAR and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Maura Escobar, et al v. National Maintenance Contracto, et al
as 21-35780
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MAURA ESCOBAR, ROGELIO RODRIGUEZ, RAQUEL ESCOBAR and others
Defendant / Appellant:
NATIONAL MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, NMC FRANCHISING, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, MARSDEN SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation and others
Maura Escobar, et al v. NMC, et al
as 21-35765
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAURA ESCOBAR, ROGELIO RODRIGUEZ, RAQUEL ESCOBAR and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONAL MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, NMC FRANCHISING, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, MARSDEN SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation and others
Macias-Solis v. Garland
as 21-368
Petitioner:
RICARDO MACIAS-SOLIS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Jose Solis
as 21-50142
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE ALFREDO SOLIS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Jose Solis
as 21-50140
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE ALFREDO SOLIS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kohen Uhuru v. R. Singh, et al
as 21-15932
Defendant / Appellee:
KIM PETERSEN, C. BROWN, A. CHAUDHRY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KOHEN DIALLO UHURU, AKA Diallo Dynomite, AKA Diallo Earl Uhuru
Solis Ramos v. Garland
as 21-49
Petitioner:
ESTHER SOLIS RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Alberto Solis
as 21-50083
Defendant / Appellant:
ALBERTO SOLIS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Miguel Solis-Jaramillo v. Merrick Garland
as 21-70782
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Petitioner:
MIGUEL SOLIS-JARAMILLO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
