Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 41 - 47 of 47
MOFFETT v. PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01915
Plaintiff: COLEMAN SCOTT MOFFETT
Defendant: PRUDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and HILDA L. SOLIS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451 E.R.I.S.A.
Type: Labor None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01902
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Type: Civil Rights None
UPMC BRADDOCK et al v. SOLIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01210
Plaintiff: UPMC BRADDOCK, UPMC MCKEESPORT and UPMC SOUTHSIDE
Defendant: HILDA L. SOLIS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, MARY ANNSEDLACEK and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Type: Other Statutes None
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01035
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01009
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Viol. of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Type: Civil Rights None
ACOSTA ORELLANA et al v. CROPLIFE INTERNATIONAL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv01790
Plaintiff: JORGE WASHINGTON ACOSTA ORELLANA, JORGE ALFREDO ARAGUNDI LA MOTA, JORGE VINCENTE ACOSTA GARRIDO and others
Defendant: CROPLIFE INTERNATIONAL, CROPLIFE ECUADOR, DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2004cv01469
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?