Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
MIRROR LAKE VILLAGE, LLC et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2016cv01955
Plaintiff:
MIRROR LAKE VILLAGE, LLC , YANXUE DENG , HUI GE and others
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, LEON RODRIGUEZ and NICHOLAS COLUCCI
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Ying Lu, et al v. Mark Lezell, et al
as 15-7028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ying Qing Lu, "Lucy", Oklahoma Shelf Exploration And Development, LLC, (OSED) and Afshin Afsharnia
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Bridges Financial, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
Mark Lloyd Lezell and Isam Ghosh
Carol Grunewald, et al v. Jonathan Jarvis, et al
as 13-5136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carol Grunewald, Jeremy Rifkin, Anne Barton and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Jonathan B. Jarvis and Sally Jewell
GRUNEWALD et al v. JARVIS et al
as 1:2012cv01738
Plaintiff:
CAROL GRUNEWALD , JEREMY RIFKIN , ANNE BARTON and others
Defendant:
JONATHAN B. JARVIS and KENNETH SALAZAR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
LU v. ZHU
as 1:2012cv00439
Plaintiff:
YING QING LU
Defendant:
LAI DI ZHU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LU v. LEZELL et al
as 1:2011cv01815
Plaintiff:
YING QING LU
Defendant:
MARK LEZELL and ISAM GHOSH
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Robert Prunte v. Universal Music Group, Inc., et al
as 10-7058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert R. Prunte'
Defendant - Appellee:
Universal Music Group, Inc., Warner Music Group, Ted Turner, Chief Executive of Atlantic Music Group & Atlantic Records & Warner Chappell Publishnig and others
LI v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv00662
Plaintiff:
YING LI
Defendant:
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
