Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Brady v. Mecox Lane Limited et al
as 1:2011cv00034
Plaintiff:
Walter P. Brady
Defendant:
Mecox Lane Limited , Neil Nanpeng Shen , John J. Ying and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Arfa v. Mecox Lane Limited et al
as 1:2010cv09053
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Arfa
Defendant:
Mecox Lane Limited, Neil Nanpeng Shen, John J. Ying and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Elliot v. China Green Agricultures, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00648
Defendant:
China Green Agricultures, Inc., Tao Li, Ken Ren and others
Plaintiff:
Frederic Elliot
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Chen et al v. Next Level Trading Capital LLC et al
as 1:2010cv02842
Plaintiff:
Ling Chen, Bao Zhen Liang, Chen Qiang and others
Defendant:
Commerce Bancorp, Inc., Dime Community Bancshares, Inc., Does 1 through 15 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Yu v. Canadian Solar Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv04562
Plaintiff:
Kwun Ying Yu
Defendant:
Canadian Solar Inc., Shawn Xiaohua Qu and Arthur Chien
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Tang et al
as 3:2009cv05146
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission and Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
King Chuen Tang, Ronald Yee, Zisen Yu and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
In Re: American Home Mortgage Securities Litigation
as 2:2007md01898
Petitioner:
Sharon A. Jacobs, Isaac Trifonidis, Paul & Pauline Runnells and others
Plaintiff:
Elliot Greenberg, Gail Fialkov, Dana Marlin and others
Defendant:
American Home Mortgage Investment Corp., Michael Strauss, Stephen A. Hozie and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Lui v. American Home Mortgage Investment Corp. et al
as 2:2007cv03198
Plaintiff:
Yuk Ying Lui
Defendant:
American Home Mortgage Investment Corp., Michael Strauss and Stephen A. Hozie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
