Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv11316
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
TRI-SOURCE PHARMA, LLC v. JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS A-Z
as 2:2018cv08940
Plaintiff:
TRI-SOURCE PHARMA, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS A-Z
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. v. GUNTER-KING et al
as 1:2017cv05363
Defendant:
ANDREA Z. GUNTER-KING, JOHNNIE KING and QUINSULON ISRAEL
Plaintiff:
WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ABSOLUTE POWER SYSTEMS, INC. et al v. CUMMINS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv08539
Plaintiff:
ABSOLUTE POWER SYSTEMS, INC. and JAMES NEMEC
Defendant:
CUMMINS, INC. , COOPER LEVENSON, P.A. and RONA Z KAPLAN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
BULKHAUL LTD. et al v. KOPROWICZ et al
as 3:2015cv08076
Plaintiff:
BULKHAUL LTD. and BULKHAUL (USA) INCORPORATED
Defendant:
JOHN Z. KOPROWICZ, JR., EAST COAST LOGISTICS CONSULTING, ABC CORPORATIONS 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv06172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FASHION LUXURY ATELIER, INC. v. BUCHANSKY et al
as 3:2015cv03698
Plaintiff:
FASHION LUXURY ATELIER, INC.
Defendant:
DAVID SEAN BUCHANSKY, JARED LYLE BUCHANSKY , GOKHAN KIZILKAYA and others
Cross_claimant:
JARED LYLE BUCHANSKY
Cross_defendant:
DAVID SEAN BUCHANSKY, DAVID SEAN ENTERPRISES, LLC, FASHION LUXURY ATELIER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
