Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Jerome Donnon v. Domingo Uribe, Jr.
as 10-56976
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEROME LARRY DONNON
Respondent - Appellee:
DOMINGO URIBE, Jr., A.W.
Thomas Hightower v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 09-80182
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
THOMAS A. HIGHTOWER
Defendant - Respondent:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, EDWARD S. ALEMEDIA, N. GRANNIS and others
Derrick Brown v. Craig Apker, et al
as 09-17172
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG APKER, Warden, S. HOLLEMBACK, A. W., SUSAN MCCLINTOCK, A.W. and others
Derrick Brown v. Craig Apker, et al
as 09-17142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG APKER, Warden, S. HOLLEMBACK, A. W., SUSAN MCCLINTOCK, A.W. and others
Derrick Brown v. Craig Apker, et al
as 09-16280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG APKER, Warden, S. HOLLEMBACK, A. W., SUSAN MCCLINTOCK, A.W. and others
Derrick Brown v. Craig Apker, et al
as 09-16140
Petitioner - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
CRAIG APKER, Warden, HALLOMBAYK, A.W., J. RUCKER, Unit Manager and others
Derrick Brown v. Craig Apker, et al
as 09-15742
Petitioner - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
CRAIG APKER, Warden, HALLOMBAYK, A.W., J. RUCKER, Unit Manager and others
Derrick Brown v. Craig Apker, et al
as 09-15743
Petitioner - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
CRAIG APKER, Warden, HALLOMBAYK, A.W., J. RUCKER, Unit Manager and others
Derrick Brown v. Craig Apker, et al
as 09-15464
Petitioner - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
CRAIG APKER, Warden, HALLOMBAYK, A.W., J. RUCKER, Unit Manager and others
Derrick Brown v. Craig Apker, et al
as 09-15318
Petitioner - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
CRAIG APKER, Warden, HALLOMBAYK, A.W., J. RUCKER, Unit Manager and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
