Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Occupant Safety Systems - End-Payor Actions
as S:2012cv00603
Plaintiff:
Brad Zirulnik , A1A Airport & Limousine Service, Inc. , Frank Cosenza and others
Defendant:
Autoliv, Incorporated , Autoliv ASP, Incorporated , Autoliv B.V. & Co. KG and others
Occupant Safety Systems - Lead Case
as S:2012cv00600
Plaintiff:
Beam's Industries, Inc. , Findlay Industries, Incorporated , Martens Cars of Washington, Inc and others
Defendant:
Autoliv, Incorporated , Autoliv ASP, Incorporated , Autoliv B.V. & Co. KG and others
A1A Airport & Limousine Service, Inc. v. Autoliv, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv12499
Plaintiff:
A1A Airport & Limousine Service, Inc.
Defendant:
Autoliv, Inc., Autoliv ASP, Inc., Autoliv B.V. & Co. KG and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2012md02311
Plaintiff:
A1A Airport & Limousine Service, Inc., AGA Realty LLC, Ifeoma Adams and others
Defendant:
AB SKF, ALPS Electric (North America), Inc., Alps Automotive, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
American Honda Motor Company, Inc., Timmy A. Curtis, Sherman Bearings, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Mitsubishi Motors Credit of America, Inc., Thomas Saris, Jim Sciaroni and others
Petitioner:
Sandra Singer and David Dishman
Respondent:
Hino Motors Manufacturing U.S.A. Inc.
In Re:
Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation
Special Master:
Gene J. Esshaki
Intervenor:
Financial Recovery Services, LLC and United States of America
Claimant:
Certain End-Payor Settlement Class Members and Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc.
Jacobson v. A1A Airport & Limousine Service Inc.
as 9:2008cv80734
Plaintiff:
Leslie Jacobson and Leslie Jacobson
Defendant:
A1A Airport & Limousine Service Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Schulman v. A1A Airport & Limousine Service Inc.
as 9:2008cv80601
Plaintiff:
Michael Schulman and Michael Schulman
Defendant:
A1A Airport & Limousine Service Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
