Cases 41 - 50 of 92
STRUNACK et al v. HEINRICH et al
as 3:2017cv04867
Defendant:
ERWIN HEINRICH , ERLI EXPEDITIONS LLC , JOHN DOES 1-50 and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT STRUNACK , NICHOLAS STRUNACK and HARRISON STRUNACK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
LY et al v. LESENSKYJ
as 3:2017cv02203
Defendant:
GEORGE J LESENSKYJ, JOHN DOES 1-50, ABC CORPS 1-50 and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES LY and NGA LAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ROLDAN et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2017cv00715
Plaintiff:
ISABEL ROLDAN and BAIRON CASTANO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, TERESEA E MOMBER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
DALTON v. CHIQUITA BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv08273
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO E DALTON
Defendant:
CHIQUITA BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC., GREAT WHITE FLEET, LTD., UNITED FRUIT TRANSPORTS and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0740 DAMAGE OR INJURY CAUSED BY VESSEL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05603
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv05072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
