Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv06878
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv06848
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
City of Livonia Employees' Retirement System v. Wachovia Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv08268
Plaintiff:
City of Livonia Employees' Retirement System, City of Livonia Employees' Retirement System, City of Livonia Employees' Retirement System and others
Defendant:
Wachovia Corporation, Wachovia Capital Trust IV, Wachovia Capital Trust IX and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Lefcourt v. Ing Groep N.V. et al
as 1:2009cv02667
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lefcourt and Jeffrey Lefcourt
Defendant:
Ing Groep N.V., ING Financial Holdings Corporation, Stitching ING Aandelen and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi et al v. Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01392
Plaintiff:
Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi, Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi, Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi and others
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc., Merrill Lynch Mortgage Lending, Inc., Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Caraballo v. Ing Groep N.V. et al
as 1:2009cv01284
Plaintiff:
Nelson Caraballo, Nelson Caraballo, Nelson Caraballo and others
Defendant:
Ing Groep N.V., ING Financial Holdings Corporation, Stichting ING Aandelen and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Freidus et al v. ING Group N.V. et al
as 1:2009cv01049
Plaintiff:
Marshall Freidus and Edward P. Zemprelli
Defendant:
ING Group N.V., ING Financial Holdings Corporation, Fred S. Hubbell and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Iron Workers Local No.25 Pension Fund et al v. Credit-Based Asset Servicing and Securitization LLC et al
as 1:2008cv10841
Plaintiff:
Iron Workers Local No.25 Pension Fund, Iron Workers Local No.25 Pension Fund, Iron Workers Local No.25 Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Credit-Based Asset Servicing and Securitization LLC, Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
W.R. Huff Asset v. Deloitte & Touche, et al
as 1:2003cv05752
Plaintiff:
W.R. Huff Asset Management, Co., LLC.
Defendant:
Deloitte & Touche , Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. , Credit Suisse, New York Branch and others
Movant:
Ainsworth E. Morris
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
In Re: WorldCom, Inc. Securities Litigation
as 1:2002cv03288
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Sam P. Seay, State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio, Jere L. Beasley and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Bank of America Securities LLC, Banc of America Securities LLC, Credit Suisse Group and others
Petitioner:
Locals 302 and 612 of the International Union of operating Engineers-Employers Construction Retirement Trust, The National Asbestos Workers Pension Fund, State of Alaska Department of Revenue and others
Plaintiff:
Plumbers & Steamfitters Local 577 Pension Fund, Wayne L. Matthews, George T. Flyny and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Jack Grubman, Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. and Citigroup Global Markets Limited
Claimant:
Paul G. Rochmis, UBS Financial Services Inc., Holly M. Haik and others
Appellant:
Terry Neal, Teresa O. Moxley, Retirement Systems of Alabama and others
Defendant:
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Worldcom, Inc., ABN Amro Incorporated and others
Lead Plaintiff:
New York State Common Retirement Fund, HGK Asset Management, H. Carl McCall and others
Respondent:
Roslyn Berger
Not Classified By Court:
Jane B. Selfe, James J. Savage, Cynthia R. Levin Moulton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
