Cases 1 - 6 of 6
MICHAEL et al v. A.W. CHESTERTON INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67765
Plaintiff:
PAUL H. MICHAEL and SONIA D MICHAEL
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON INC. , AEROQUIP-VICKERS, INC., AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant:
GARDNER DENVER INC, HARLEY-DAVIDSON INC. , WEIL McLAIN COMPANY and others
Cross_defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON INC. , AEROQUIP-VICKERS, INC., AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael et al v. A.W. Chesterton Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01023
Plaintiff:
Paul H. Michael and Sonia D. Michael
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Inc. , Aeroquip-Vickers Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
Cross_defendant:
Curtiss-Wright Corporation , A.W. Chesterton Inc. , Aeroquip-Vickers Inc. and others
Pecial_master:
Vincent J. Poppiti, (SM)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
SNIDER et al v. MCCORMICK ASBESTOS COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv62795
Plaintiff:
LINDA L. SNIDER, LINDA L. SNIDER, REX SNIDER and others
Defendant:
MCCORMICK ASBESTOS COMPANY, HOPEMAN BROTHERS, INC., HOPEMAN BROTHERS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
JONES v. MCCORMICK ASBESTOS CO. et al
as 2:2007cv62819
Plaintiff:
MARVIN JONES
Defendant:
MCCORMICK ASBESTOS CO. , UNIROYAL INC , RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWARD et al v. MCCORMICK ASBESTOS CO. et al
as 2:2007cv62806
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. HOWARD, JOHN W. HOWARD, CARRIE HOWARD and others
Defendant:
MCCORMICK ASBESTOS CO., HOPEMAN BROTHERS, INC., HOPEMAN BROTHERS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
JOHNSON v. MCCORMICK ASBESTOS CO. et al
as 2:2007cv62805
Plaintiff:
EDWARD S. JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant:
MCCORMICK ASBESTOS CO., HOPEMAN BROTHERS, INC., UNIROYAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
