Cases 71 - 80 of 302
v. KEMPEN et al
as 2:2010cv67803
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KEMPEN
Defendant:
ACANDS INC, AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AW CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ERICKSON v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67813
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ERICKSON
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AW CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MELZER v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67887
Plaintiff:
DANIEL K MELZER
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FIDELER v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67890
Plaintiff:
ROBERT FIDELER
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AP GREEN REFRACTORIES CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GLOBIG v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67759
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE GLOBIG
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOSZ v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67808
Plaintiff:
HELEN GOSZ
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AW CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KNAEBE v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67881
Plaintiff:
GUSTAVE KNAEBE
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, A W CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67812
Plaintiff:
DONALD JOHNSON
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PFILE v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67815
Plaintiff:
CAROL PFILE
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AW CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SZYMANSKI v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67884
Plaintiff:
DIANNE M SZYMANSKI
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
