Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Al Otro Lado, et al v. Executive Office for Immigration Review, et al
as 22-56036
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AL OTRO LADO, a California corporation, ABIGAIL DOE, BEATRICE DOE and others
Appellee:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary of Homeland Security, CHRISTOPHER MAGNUS, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and PETE FLORES, Executive Assistant Commissioner of CBP's Office of Field Operations, in their official capacities
Al Otro Lado, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 22-55988
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AL OTRO LADO, a California corporation, ABIGAIL DOE, BEATRICE DOE and others
Appellant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary of Homeland Security, CHRISTOPHER MAGNUS, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), PETE FLORES, Executive Assistant Commiser of CBP's Office of Field Operations, in their official capacities and others
Al Otro Lado, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-56287
Plaintiff / Appellee:
VICTORIA DOE, MARIA DOE, JOSE DOE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM A. FERRARA, Executive Assistant Commissioner of CBPs Office of Field Operations, MARK A. MORGAN, Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary, US Department of Homeland Security
Appellant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW
Al Otro Lado, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 19-56417
Plaintiff / Appellee:
VICTORIA DOE, MARIA DOE, JOSE DOE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
TODD C. OWEN, Executive Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations, United States Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity, MARK A. MORGAN, Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary, US Department of Homeland Security
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
