Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Lytton Band of Pomo Indians v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 3:2019cv03224
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
LYTTON BAND OF POMO INDIANS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Tule River Indian Tribe of California v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 3:2019cv03222
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
TULE RIVER INDIAN TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City and County of San Francisco et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 4:2018cv07591
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Richard S. Sackler, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
City and County of San Francisco and The People of the State of California acting by and through San Francisco City Attorney Dennis J. Herrera
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Humboldt County v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv04375
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Humboldt County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
