Cases 31 - 35 of 35
GORDON v. AMERICAN EXPORT LINES, INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2010cv37917
Plaintiff:
SHERMAN GORDON
Defendant:
AMERICAN EXPORT LINES, INCORPORATED, AMERICAN FOREIGN S.S. CORPORATION , CROWLEY TOWING AND TRANSPORTATION COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MILLER v. AGWIC LINES et al
as 2:2010cv37853
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
AGWIC LINES, AMERICAN EXPORT LINES, INCORPORATED, AMERICAN FOREIGN S.S. CORPORATION and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
TEXACO INC.
Thirdparty_defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER IND INC , PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , NATIONAL GYPSUM CO and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
DEVEREAUX v. A.H. BULL AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv37886
Plaintiff:
ROBERT F. DEVEREAUX
Defendant:
A.H. BULL AND COMPANY, AMERICAN FOREIGN S.S. CORPORATION , AMERICAN HAWAIIAN S.S. LINES and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPANSATION FUND , NATIONAL GYPSUM CO , KEENE CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
PIPKIN et al v. AMERICAN FOREIGN S.S. CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv80245
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE J. PIPKIN and CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
AMERICAN FOREIGN S.S. CORPORATION, AMERICAN FOREIGN S.S. CORPORATION, CEFOR CARGO AND SHIPS, INCORPORATED and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
TEXACO INC, KEYSTONE SHIPPING COMPANY, KEYSTONE SHIPPING COMPANY and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER IND INC, EAGLE-PICHER IND INC, NATIONAL GYPSUM CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
COLE et al v. AMERADA HESS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv80243
Plaintiff:
HARRY COLE, SR. and CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
AMERADA HESS CORPORATION, AMERADA HESS CORPORATION, AMERICAN TRADING TRANSPORTATION COMPANY and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
TEXACO INC
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
