Cases 1 - 9 of 9
City Of New York v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv04807
Defendant:
ExxonMobil Oil Corporation, BP America Inc., Exxon Mobil Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
City Of New York and The City of New York
Amicus Curiae:
Energy Policy Advocates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Environmental Justice Health Alliance et al v. Council on Environmental Quality et al
as 1:2020cv06143
Plaintiff:
New York Civil Liberties Union, Texas Environmental Justice Advocacy Services, National Audubon Society and others
Defendant:
Mary B Neumayr and Council on Environmental Quality
Intervenor:
National Cattlemens Beef Association, American Road & Transportation Builders Association, American Forest Resource Council and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of New York et al v. Wheeler et al
as 1:2019cv11673
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, City of New York, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
Andrew R. Wheeler, R. D. James, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Public Lands Council, American Petroleum Institute, National Alliance of Forest Owners and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State Of New York v. Pruitt et al
as 1:2018cv01030
Plaintiff:
State Of New York , State of California , State of Connecticut and others
Defendant:
E. Scott Pruitt , United States Environmental Protection Agency , Ryan A. Fisher and others
Intervenor_defendant:
American Farm Bureau Federation , American Forest & Paper Association , American Petroleum Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. et al v. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 1:2018cv01048
Plaintiff:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. and National Wildlife Federation
Defendant:
Environmental Protection Agency , E. Scott Pruitt , Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor_defendant:
American Farm Bureau Federation , American Forest & Paper Association , American Petroleum Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Constitution Pipeline Company, v. New York State Department of E
as 16-1568
Petitioner:
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC
Respondent:
Basil Seggos, Acting Commissioner, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, John Ferguson, Chief Permit Administrator, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Intervenor:
Stop the Pipeline, Catskill Mountainkeeper, Inc., Sierra Club and others
Amicus Curiae:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Water Defense, Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. and others
Cooling Water Intake Structure v. United States Environmental Pr
as 14-4645
Petitioner:
Cooling Water Intake Structure Coalition
Respondent:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Gina McCarthy, National Marine Fisheries Service and others
Intervenor:
Center for Biological Diversity, Louisiana Environmental Action Network, California Coastkeeper Alliance and others
Amicus Curiae:
Clean Air Task Force
Damascus Citizens for Sustainability, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 1:2011cv03857
Intervenor Defendant:
American Petroleum Institute, INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, and US OIL & GAS ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
Carol Collier, Brigadier General Peter A. DeLuca, Delaware River Basin Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Damascus Citizens for Sustainability, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Delaware Riverkeeper Network et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 1:2011cv03780
Intervenor Defendant:
American Petroleum Institute, Independent Petroleum Association of America and US OIL & GAS ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
Carol Collier, Brigadier General Peter A. DeLuca, Delaware River Basin Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Delaware Riverkeeper Network, National Parks Conservation Association, Riverkeeper, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
