Cases 1 - 10 of 969
BUGARIN v. AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LTD. et al
as 2:2012cv30004
Plaintiff:
JOSE M BUGARIN
Defendant:
AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LTD., A.W. CHESTERTON CO. , CRANE COMPANY and others
Cross_claimant:
CRANE COMPANY and A.W. CHESTERTON CO.
Cross_defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON CO. , AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LTD., CROWN, CORK & SEAL CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
COLLADO v. AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD.
as 2:2011cv68739
Plaintiff:
HERMAN L COLLADO
Defendant:
AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
WILLIAMS v. AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LTD.
as 2:2011cv57533
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK WILLIAMS
Defendant:
AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LTD.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILLER v. AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LTD.
as 2:2011cv57675
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LTD.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ELLIOT v. AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LTD.
as 2:2011cv58034
Plaintiff:
CURTIS ELLIOT
Defendant:
AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LTD.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
VAIL v. AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LTD.
as 2:2011cv59372
Plaintiff:
THOMAS H VAIL
Defendant:
AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LTD.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BROWN v. AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LTD., ET. AL.
as 2:2011cv55302
Plaintiff:
BAILEY M. BROWN
Defendant:
AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LTD., ET. AL.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
PAYNE et al v. AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LTD.
as 2:2011cv55271
Plaintiff:
CULLING PAYNE , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LTD.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BERGER v. AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD.
as 5:2011cv53980
Plaintiff:
SOLOMON R. BERGER
Defendant:
AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DICKSON v. AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LTD
as 2:2011cv55286
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO H DICKSON
Defendant:
AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LTD
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
