Cases 1 - 10 of 208
Ashe v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65290
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ashe
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilson v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00897
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Wilson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Andrews v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00903
Plaintiff:
Mary Margaret Andrews
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ronfeldt v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00668
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ronfeldt
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Weber et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00625
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Andrew Weber and Daniel Weber
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Taylor v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Andrew Taylor
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stevens v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Stevens
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tritschler v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
ANDREW TIMOTHY TRITSCHLER
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bork v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Andrew Bork
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lanier v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04275
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lanier
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
