Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Rodriguez v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
as 8:2023cv01805
Plaintiff:
Dayami Rodriguez
Defendant:
Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv60373
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv60308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Belcher v. Aramark Uniforms & Career Apparel, LLC
as 3:2021cv00375
Plaintiff:
Alton Belcher
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Aramark Sports and Entertainment Services, LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
Fasttrack Staffing, Inc.
Defendant:
Aramark Uniforms & Career Apparel, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv60134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv60141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BARRIOS-MENDEZ et al v. TOPGOLF USA MIAMI GARDENS, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv23624
Defendant:
TOPGOLF USA MIAMI GARDENS, LLC and Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel LLC
Plaintiff:
raul mendez and Maria BARRIOS-MENDEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv61014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0621
Medina v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC et al
as 0:2016cv60734
Plaintiff:
Christian Medina
Defendant:
Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC and Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Crane v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel LLC et al
as 1:2014cv21763
Plaintiff:
RUTH CRANE
Defendant:
ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL LLC and PANERA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
