Cases 1 - 8 of 8
MONROE v. ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79309
Plaintiff:
GRAFTON MONROE
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY, INC., CELOTEX CORPORATION, EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOODRUFF v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv69416
Plaintiff:
ELDEN WOODRUFF
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , OWENS ILLINOIS, INC. , PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOLEY v. ACANDS INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2009cv64464
Plaintiff:
FRANK W FOLEY
Defendant:
ACANDS INCORPORATED, ACANDS INCORPORATED, ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ORTON v. ACANDS INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2009cv64444
Plaintiff:
DONALD R. ORTON
Defendant:
ACANDS INCORPORATED, ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY INC, CAREY CANADA INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BURGESS v. ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY INC et al
as 2:2009cv64477
Plaintiff:
LYLE BURGESS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY INC, ASBESTOS CORP LTD, EJ BARTELLS COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BOHNA v. ACANDS INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2009cv64471
Plaintiff:
WINIFRED BOHNA
Defendant:
ACANDS INCORPORATED, ACANDS INCORPORATED, ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ELLIS v. ACANDS INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2009cv64472
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. ELLIS
Defendant:
ACANDS INCORPORATED, ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY INC, AP GREEN REFRACTORIES COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WOOD v. ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY INC et al
as 2:2009cv64466
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WOOD
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY INC, ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY INC, ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
