Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Margie Holman, et al. v. Armstrong World Ind., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-69821
Plaintiff:
Margie Holman
Defendant:
Armstrong World Ind
Charles A. Goodson, et al. v. Armstrong World Ind., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-69835
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Goodson
Defendant:
Armstrong World Ind
Joseph And Nancy Valentine v. Armstrong World Ind., Certaineed, et al.
as PAE/2:87-CV-06105
Plaintiff:
Joseph And Nancy Valentine
Defendant:
Armstrong World Ind., Certaineed
Cathryn Maupin, et al. v. Armstrong World Ind., Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:87-CV-08514
Plaintiff:
Cathryn Maupin
Defendant:
Armstrong World Ind., Inc
Frances Prohira v. Armstrong World Ind., Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:87-CV-08516
Plaintiff:
Frances Prohira
Defendant:
Armstrong World Ind., Inc
Hattie Dziadosz, et al. v. Armstrong World Ind., Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:87-CV-08519
Plaintiff:
Hattie Dziadosz
Defendant:
Armstrong World Ind., Inc
Dawn Ackerman, et al. v. Armstrong World Ind., Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:87-CV-08515
Plaintiff:
Dawn Ackerman
Defendant:
Armstrong World Ind., Inc
In Re: Kensington, et al
as 03-4212
Not Party - Petitioner:
In re: KENSINGTON INTL and SPRINGFIELD ASSOCIATES
Not Party - Respondent:
BARON & BUDD CLAIMANTS, CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP, as Agent for the Bank Group, OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF ASBESTOS CLAIMANTS and others
Debtor:
OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF ASBESTOS CLAIMANTS OF OWENS CORNING and ARMSTRONG WORLD IND
Debtor - Respondent:
CDC CORP, ENGINEERING YARNS OF AMERICA INC, EXTERIOR SYS INC and others
Not Party - Amicus Curiae:
USG CORP and WASHINGTON LEGAL
Not Party - Intervenor:
OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS OF USG CORPORATION and OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS OF ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Not Party - Amicus Appellant:
AMERICAN INS ASSN, American Insurance Association
Not Party - Amicus Appellee:
ERIC D. GREEN
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
ALFRED M WOLIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
