Cases 21 - 30 of 456
Goldstein v. Wratschko et al
as 2:2023cv02045
Plaintiff:
Munro Goldstein
Defendant:
Arnold Wratschko, WASM, LLC., Patricia Louise Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Ruggiero v. Rogers et al
as 1:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
Donald D. Rogers, Mark E. Carrow, Joseph H. Noeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorsey et al v. Colgate Palmolive Company
as 7:2023cv01426
Plaintiff:
Kathy Dorsey and Arnold Thomas
Defendant:
Colgate Palmolive Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
PIRS Capital, LLC v. Arnold's Office Furniture, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
PIRS Capital, LLC
Defendant:
Arnold's Office Furniture, LLC and Jay Berkowitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rodriguez v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv01020
Plaintiff:
Victor Rodriguez
Defendant:
M.D. David D. Williams, Concetta M. Partrige and Kay G. Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akins et al v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06510
Plaintiff:
OSCAR AKINS, ALI AL-REKABI, MICHELE ALSPACH and others
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., James Monsees, Adam Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Coffman v. Signify Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08622
Plaintiff:
Catherine Coffman
Defendant:
Signify Health, Inc., Matthew S. Holt, Kyle B. Peterson and others
Lifshitz v. Signify Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08564
Plaintiff:
Phil Lifshitz
Defendant:
Signify Health, Inc., Matthew S. Holt, Kyle B. Peterson and others
Bushansky v. Signify Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08527
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Signify Health, Inc., Matthew S. Holt, Kyle B. Peterson and others
Minzer v. Signify Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08540
Plaintiff:
Shoshana Minzer
Defendant:
Signify Health, Inc., Matthew S. Holt, Kyle Armbrester and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
