Cases 31 - 40 of 2,520
ELLER v. AC AND S, INC et al
as 2:2010cv68941
Plaintiff:
VIOLA A ELLER
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOGUE v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv69006
Plaintiff:
ARCHIE E HOGUE
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , CSR LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOOTH v. AC AND S, INC et al
as 2:2010cv68944
Plaintiff:
WILLARD BOOTH
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC, AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HANN v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv69005
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R HANN
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , CSR LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VICTOR v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv69019
Plaintiff:
THOMAS VICTOR
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , A P GREEN INDUSTRIES, AIRCO INC/ BOC GROUP, THE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RILEY v. A. C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2010cv68956
Plaintiff:
JAMES H RILEY
Defendant:
A. C. AND S., INC. , C S R, LTD., CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCLELLAN v. AC AND S, INC et al
as 2:2010cv68938
Plaintiff:
MELVIN S. MCCLELLAN
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES, AW CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KOONTZ v. AC AND S, INC et al
as 2:2010cv68936
Plaintiff:
OPAL KOONTZ
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC , AMERICAN STEEL AND WIRE CO, ANACONDA CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVOL v. A C & S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68909
Plaintiff:
DANDY D EVOL, SR
Defendant:
A C & S INC , CHICAGO FIREBRICK CO , DRESSER INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOORE v. A. C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2010cv68961
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. MOORE
Defendant:
A. C. AND S., INC. , C S R LTD., CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
