Cases 31 - 40 of 79
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Music et al
as 1:2012cv02426
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Nedzad Music and 5074 Royal T. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv08745
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sherman v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv05857
Plaintiff:
Richard Sherman
Defendant:
AT&T Inc. , AT&T Teleholdings, Inc. and SBC Internet Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vassos v. AT&T Pension Benefit Plan et al
as 1:2011cv04891
Plaintiff:
Mary Vassos
Defendant:
AT&T Pension Benefit Plan , Benefit Plan Committee (AT&T), AT&T Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. 5074 Royal T., Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv04277
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
5074 Royal T., Inc. and Nedzad Music
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Casimere-Cooks v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1 - AT&T Sickness and Accident Disability Plan for Occupational Employees et al
as 3:2011cv00402
Plaintiff:
Lawanda Casimere-Cooks
Defendant:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1 - AT&T Sickness and Accident Disability Plan for Occupational Employees , AT&T Inc. and AT&T Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Langland v. AT&T Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv04037
Plaintiff:
Jay Langland
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc. and AT&T Inc. Severance Pay Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Sipple v. AT&T, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv02669
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc. and AT&T Mobility, LLC.
Plaintiff:
Donald Sipple
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bosse v. AT&T et al
as 1:2010cv02324
Plaintiff:
Eric Bosse
Defendant:
AT&T Inc and AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
