Cases 61 - 70 of 3,353
Pio Lucas-Lorenzo v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-3539
Petitioner:
Pio David Lucas-Lorenzo
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
COXON v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS et al
as 3:2023cv24703
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN COXON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS, UNITED STATES MARSHALLS, UNITED STATES DEPUTY MARSHALLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Juana Alonzo-Perez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3146
Petitioner:
JUANA ALONZO-PEREZ and JUANA ALONZO-ALONZO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
F. J. A. P. v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-3117
Petitioner:
F. J. A. P.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Ivan Hernandez-Garcia v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-3074
Petitioner:
IVAN HERNANDEZ-GARCIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Heriberta Plancarte Martinez, et al v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-3077
Petitioner:
HERIBERTA PLANCARTE MARTINEZ, D. R. G. P., a minor and W. J. G. P., a minor
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Mukhar Mursal v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-3386
Petitioner:
Mukhar Mohamed Mursal
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Not Classified By Court:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Monica Aguilar Morales, et al v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-3056
Petitioner:
MONICA AGUILAR MORALES and P. V. M. A., a minor
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Eva Becerril-Sanchez v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-3349
Petitioner:
Eva Maria Becerril-Sanchez
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Manuel Sumba-Yunga v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-3046
Petitioner:
MANUEL DEIFILIO SUMBA-YUNGA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
