Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Malone et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00406
Defendant:
Genuine Parts Company, Crown Cork & Seal Company Inc., Crane Co. and others
Cross Defendant:
Ingersoll Rand Company, Trane US Inc., Hopeman Brothers Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Riley Power Inc., FMC Corporation, Sterling Fluid Systems (USA) LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Malone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Tallman v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2013cv01828
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Tallman
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company , Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Genuine Parts Company , IMO Industries Inc. , SB Decking Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Genuine Parts Company , 84 Lumber Company , Ace Hardware Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Brandenburg et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01714
Plaintiff:
Rollin Brandenburg and Elaine Brandenburg
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , American Biltrite Co. , Atwood & Morrill Company Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
American Biltrite Co. , Aurora Pump Company and Cleaver-Brooks Inc.
Cross_defendant:
American Biltrite Co. , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Atwood & Morrill Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Patterson Mims et al v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2013cv00298
Plaintiff:
Patterson Mims and Vera Mims
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company , AO Smith Corporation, Advance Auto Parts Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Cleaver-Brooks Inc. and Ericsson Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Cleaver-Brooks Inc., 84 Lumber Company , AGCO Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Patterson Mims et al v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2012cv01227
Defendant:
American Biltrite Inc., CNH America LLC, HB Smith Company Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Patterson Mims and Vera Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
