Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Rojas v. Godlewski et al
as 1:2022cv06218
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
Sarah Godlewski, Sarah For Wisconsin Inc and Actblue LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rojas v. Val Demings for U.S. Senate Inc et al
as 1:2022cv06158
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
Val Demings for U.S. Senate Inc, Valdez Venita Demings and Actblue LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rojas v. Beto for Texas et al
as 1:2022cv05998
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
Beto for Texas, Beto O'Rourke, Democratic Victory Pac, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rojas v. DCCC et al
as 1:2022cv05940
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
DCCC doing business as Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and Actblue LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rojas v. Nancy Pelosi for Congress et al
as 1:2022cv05868
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
Nancy Pelosi for Congress, Nancy Pelosi and Actblue LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rojas v. Warnock et al
as 1:2022cv05742
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
Raphael Warnock, Warnock for Georgia, Stacey Abrams and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rojas v. Everyaction, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03712
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
Everyaction, Inc. doing business as NGP Van, Stuart E Trevelyan, Actblue LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Think Computer Corporation v. Dwolla, Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv02054
Defendant:
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, Facebook, Inc., Sequoia Capital U.S. Scout Seed Fund 2013, LP and others
Plaintiff:
Think Computer Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
