Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Lawrence County, Mississippi v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv00199
Plaintiff:
Lawrence County, Mississippi
Defendant:
Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Rush Health Systems, Inc. v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv01012
Plaintiff:
Rush Health Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Southwest Mississippi Regional Medical Center et al v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 5:2017cv00145
Plaintiff:
Southwest Mississippi Regional Medical Center , Infirmary Health Hospitals, Inc. and Monroe County Healthcare Authority
Defendant:
Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI v. Actavis Pharma, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00269
Plaintiff:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
Defendant:
Actavis Pharma, Inc. , Actavis Mid Atlantic LLC and Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Virginia Day v. Wyeth LLC, et al
as 2:2013cv00055
Plaintiff:
Virginia Day
Defendant:
Wyeth LLC , Schwarz Pharma, Inc. , Alaven Pharmaceutical, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Dunn v. Activis Totowa, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00088
Plaintiff:
George Dunn
Defendant:
Activis Totowa, LLC, Actavis, Inc., Actavis Elizabeth, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Buras v. Actavis Totowa, LLC. et al
as 3:2010cv00103
Plaintiff:
Tammy Buras
Defendant:
Actavis Totowa, LLC., Actavis, Inc., Actavis Elizabeth, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ruiz v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00391
Plaintiff:
Homero Ruiz
Defendant:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Actavis Group, Actavis Totowa, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
