Other Statutes Cases filed in New York
Cases 1 - 10 of 53
IN RE NAMENDA INDIRECT PURCHASER ANTITRUST LITIGATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv06549
Plaintiff: Sergeants Benevolent Association Health & Welfare Fund and A.F. of L.- A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan
Consolidated Plaintiff: MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC and MSPA Claims I, LLC
Petitioner: JM Smith Corporation
Defendant: Actavis, plc, Forest Laboratories, LLC, Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH & Co. KGaA and others
Consolidated Defendant: Allergan plc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
In Re: Actos Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv03278
Plaintiff: American Sales Company, LLC, Meijer, Inc. and Meijer Distribution, Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff: Cesar Castillo, Inc.
Defendant: Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Takeda America Holdings, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
IN RE ACTOS END PAYOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 1:2014cv02846
Defendant: Actavis plc, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda America Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Man-U Service Contract Trust Fund and Teamsters Union Local 115 Health & Welfare Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
County Of Westchester v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et al
as 7:2021cv07893
Plaintiff: County Of Westchester
Defendant: Actavis Holdco US, Inc., Actavis Elizabeth LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Erie County Medical Center Corporation et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00826
Defendant: Actavis Pharma, Inc., Actavis LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Erie County Medical Center Corporation, Catholic Health System, Inc., Sisters of Charity Hospital of Buffalo, New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
County of Albany et al v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01650
Defendant: Bausch Health Americas, Inc., Heritage Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC and others
Plaintiff: County of Schuyler, City of Mobile, WCA Group Health Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
KPH Healthcare Services, Inc. v. Hetero USA Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv08756
Defendant: Hetero USA Inc., Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Ascend Laboratories, LLC and others
Plaintiff: KPH Healthcare Services, Inc. a/k/a Kinney Drugs, Inc., KPH Healthcare Services, Inc. and Kinney Drugs, Inc.
Interested Party: J M Smith Corporation d/b/a Smith Drug Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
J M Smith Corporation v. Watson Pharma, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv07110
Defendant: Hetero USA Inc., Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Actavis, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: J M Smith Corporation and J M Smith Corporation on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated doing business as Smith Drug Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In Re Namenda Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv07488
Defendant: Merz GmbH & Co. KGaA., Actavis, plc, Forest Laboratories LLC and others
Plaintiff: JM Smith Corporation On behalf of itself and all others similarly situated doing business as Smith Drug Company
Interested Party: Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd.
Not Classified By Court: AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Cardinal Health, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al v. AbbVie Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv10087
Defendant: Allergan Sales, LLC, Hetero USA Inc., Allergan, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp.,, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Rite Aid Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?