Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Purdue Pharma L.P. et al v. Actavis Elizabeth LLC
as 1:2012cv05615
Plaintiff:
Purdue Pharma L.P. and Grunenthal GMBH
Defendant:
Actavis Elizabeth LLC
Counter_claimant:
Actavis Elizabeth LLC
Counter_defendant:
Grunenthal GMBH and Purdue Pharma L.P.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Purdue Pharma L.P. et al v. Actavis Elizabeth LLC
as 1:2011cv02038
Plaintiff:
Purdue Pharma L.P. , The P.F. Laboratories, Inc. , Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P. and others
Defendant:
Actavis Elizabeth LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Purdue Pharma L.P. et al v. Ranbaxy Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03734
Plaintiff:
Purdue Pharma L.P. , The P.F. Laboratories, Inc. , Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P. and others
Defendant:
Ranbaxy Inc., Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals Inc., Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Bates v. Actavis Totowa, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00184
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bates
Defendant:
Actavis Totowa, LLC, Actavis, Inc., Actavis Elizabeth, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Griffin v. Actavis Totowa, LLC et al
as 6:2010cv06089
Plaintiff:
James Griffin
Defendant:
Actavis Totowa, LLC, Actavis, Inc., Actavis Elizabeth, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Goldberg et al v. Actavis Totowa LLC et al
as 3:2009cv01069
Plaintiff:
Marvin Goldberg and Marvin Goldberg
Defendant:
Actavis Totowa LLC, Actavis Inc, Actavis Elizabeth LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Leu v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01245
Plaintiff:
Michael Leu
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc., Parke-Davis, Warner -Lambert Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Leu v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv05160
Plaintiff:
Michael Leu and Michael Leu
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc., Pfizer Inc., Parke-Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
