Cases 1 - 10 of 404
Gardeley v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Marque Gardeley
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, William A. Gittere, David C. Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Bean
as 2:2023cv01930
Petitioner:
Brian Adams
Respondent:
Jeremy Bean and Attorney General State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Adams et al
as 3:2023cv00563
Plaintiff:
Michael Leon Williams
Defendant:
Adams, Jesse Haines, Michael Flamm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maestas v. Adams et al
as 3:2023cv00554
Plaintiff:
Beau Maestas
Defendant:
Adams, Oakly, McArdle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. Fishman et al
as 3:2023cv00536
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
Lorin Fishman, Shannon Romero, Jennifer Kaufman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barlow v. Rose et al
as 3:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Keith Barlow
Defendant:
S. Rose, C/O Adams, David Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banasiak v. Klein et al
as 3:2023cv00426
Plaintiff:
Joshua N. Banasiak
Defendant:
Deborah Klein, David Drummond, William Gittere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welch v. Mennchem et al
as 3:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Kentrell D Welch
Defendant:
M. Mennchem, Brian Pyle, James Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pattison v. Lombardo et al.
as 3:2022cv00537
Plaintiff:
Dante H. Pattison
Defendant:
Sheriff Joe Lombardo, Brian Sandoval, Steve Sisolak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Garrett et al
as 3:2022cv00480
Petitioner:
Edward Adams
Respondent:
Garrett and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
