Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Adams v. USA
as 1:2023cv00528
Petitioner:
Clarence Adams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Myers v. Wigdorski et al
as 6:2023cv06317
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Myers
Defendant:
Det. Adam Wigdorski, Det. Christopher Gerace, Det. Paul Fitzpatric and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughey v. Wagner et al
as 6:2023cv06270
Plaintiff:
Ernest Hughey
Defendant:
William J. Wagner, Nicholas M. Adams, Connor Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lafferty v. Virts et al
as 1:2023cv00358
Plaintiff:
Adam J. Lafferty
Defendant:
Barry Virts, James Miller, Robert DiNieri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Granville et al
as 6:2022cv06433
Plaintiff:
Douglas D. Williams
Defendant:
Daniel J. Granville, Adam J. Imiolo, Timothy F. Donovan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd v. Livingston County Jail
as 6:2022cv06422
Plaintiff:
Justin Adam Byrd
Defendant:
Livingston County Jail, Zach Scott, Deputy Fennell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bartolone v. Baxter et al
as 6:2022cv06295
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bartolone
Defendant:
Todd Baxter, Deputy Donavan and Deputy Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Sewalt et al
as 1:2021cv01013
Plaintiff:
Christopher Turner
Defendant:
Timothy Sewalt, Corey May, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bangs v. Smith et al
as 6:2021cv06475
Plaintiff:
Steven Bangs
Defendant:
Walter William Smith, Jr., Susan Kickbush, Kelly R. Vannote and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bangs v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv00784
Plaintiff:
Steven Bangs
Defendant:
Walter William Smith, Jr., Susan Kickbush, Kelly R. Vannote and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
