Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Administrative District Council 1 of Illinois of the International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers, AFL-CIO v. National Restorations, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03161
Plaintiff:
Administrative District Council 1 of Illinois of the International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
National Restorations, Inc. and Design Installation Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
LCS Construction Co. et al v. Administrative District Council 1 of Illinois of International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers
as 1:2020cv07323
Plaintiff:
Local Contracting Services Construction Co., LCS Construction Co. and Kenneth W. Littwin, Jr.
Defendant:
Administrative District Council 1 of Illinois of International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Altounian Construction, Inc. v. Administrative District Council 1 of Illinois of International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers
as 1:2020cv02180
Plaintiff:
Altounian Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
Administrative District Council 1 of Illinois of International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers, AFL-CIO and Administrative District Council 1 of Illinois of International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Avila et al v. Building Improvement, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00610
Defendant:
Building Improvement, Inc. and Marcin Gwizd
Plaintiff:
Administrative District Council 1 of Illinois of the International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers, AFL-CIO and Paulino Avila
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rubio et al v. Brickster Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00609
Defendant:
Brickster Inc. and Grzegorz Przada
Plaintiff:
Yoni Rubio and Administrative District Council 1 of Illinois of the International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Administrative District Council 1 of Illinois of the International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers, AFL-CIO v. Littwin, Jr. et al
as 1:2019cv08380
Defendant:
LCS Construction Company, Local Contracting Services Construction Co. and Kenneth Littwin, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Administrative District Council 1 of Illinois of the International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Littwin Jr. v. International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers, District Council #1 et al
as 1:2019cv06826
Defendant:
International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers, District Council #1, joint arbitration board of the international union of bricklayers and International Union of Bricklayers, Administrative District Council 1 of Illinois
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Littwin Jr. and Kenneth Litwin Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Administrative District Council 1 of Illinois of the International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers, AFL-CIO et al v. Dunigan et al
as 1:2019cv06107
Plaintiff:
Administrative District Council 1 of Illinois of the International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers, AFL-CIO, Administrative District Council 1 Welfare Fund, District Council Training Center Fund and others
Defendant:
Dunigan Construction, Inc. and Rodney Dunigan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Littwin v. International Union of Bricklayers et al
as 1:2019cv05407
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Littwin, Sr.
Defendant:
Administrative District Council 1 of Illinois, The Joint Arbitration Board of the International Union of Bricklayers and International Union of Bricklayers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cleveland Marble and Mosaic Company, The v. International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers, Administrative District Council 1 of Illinois
as 1:2019cv04982
Defendant:
International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers, Administrative District Council 1 of Illinois
Plaintiff:
The Cleveland Marble and Mosaic Company and Cleveland Marble and Mosaic Company, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
