Cases 1 - 10 of 33
MacKenzie et al v. Alberto Gonzales et al
as 4:2008mc00060
Plaintiff:
Kenneth MacKenzie, Julieta Vasquez-MacKenzie, Guadalupe Vasquez and others
Defendant:
US Justice Department, United States Executive Branch of Government and Alberto Gonzales
Zakaria et al v. Roark et al
as 4:2008cv00564
Plaintiff:
Faisal Zakaria and Naeema Zakaria
Defendant:
David Roark, Emelio T Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Xiao v. Chertoff et al
as 4:2007mc00607
Plaintiff:
Jing Xiao
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Sharon A. Hudson, Alberto Gonzales and others
Momin v. Hudson et al
as 4:2007cv03096
Plaintiff:
Shoukat P. Momin
Defendant:
Sharon A Hudson, Emelio T. Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv02735
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Duyku v. Hudson et al
as 4:2007mc00498
Plaintiff:
Rosalia P Duyku
Defendant:
Sharon A Hudson, Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzales and others
Ahmad v. Gonzales et al
as 4:2007mc00472
Defendant:
UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and others
Plaintiff:
Ahmad khorrami
Chen v. Mueller et al
as 4:2007cv02213
Plaintiff:
Zhuo Chen
Defendant:
Robert Mueller, Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Yan v. Mueller et al
as 4:2007mc00355
Defendant:
Robert Mueller, Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzales and others
Plaintiff:
Zhao Yan
Shahzad v. Hudson et al
as 4:2007cv01870
Plaintiff:
Asim Shahzad
Defendant:
Sharon A. Hudson, Emelio T. Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
