Cases 11 - 20 of 63
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kinsumba v. Gonzales et al
as 4:2007cv00430
Plaintiff:
Kele Alain Kinsumba
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, F Gerald Heinauer and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Ahmad v. Gonzales et al
as 4:2007mc00472
Defendant:
UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and others
Plaintiff:
Ahmad khorrami
Smith v. Barrows et al
as 3:2007cv01228
Plaintiff:
Olga Smith
Defendant:
Angela K Barrows, Alberto Gonzales, United States Citizenship and Immigration Service and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Chen v. Mueller et al
as 4:2007cv02213
Plaintiff:
Zhuo Chen
Defendant:
Robert Mueller, Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00539
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Liu et al v. Gonzales
as 7:2007cv00090
Plaintiff:
Wenxia Liu and Hui Lu
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Yan v. Mueller et al
as 4:2007mc00355
Defendant:
Robert Mueller, Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzales and others
Plaintiff:
Zhao Yan
Shahzad v. Hudson et al
as 4:2007cv01870
Plaintiff:
Asim Shahzad
Defendant:
Sharon A. Hudson, Emelio T. Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Sunesara et al v. Roark et al
as 4:2007cv01869
Plaintiff:
Amirali Sunesara, Mumtaz Sunesara and Anish Sunesara
Defendant:
David Roark, Emelio T. Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
