Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Aldair Gomes de Oliveira, et al v. Airbus SAS, et al
as 11-16731
:
In re: AIR CRASH OVER THE MID-ATLANTIC ON JUNE 1, 2009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALDAIR GOMES DE OLIVEIRA, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Marcelo Parente Gomes de Oliveira, ALDAIR GOMES DE OLIVEIRA, father of decedent, MARIETTA ANDRADE PARENTE, mother of decedent and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AIRBUS SAS, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., THALES AVIONICS S.A. and others
Dardengo et al
as 4:2010cv04948
Plaintiff:
Jose Angelo Dardengo , Karla Martins dos Santos , Francisco Eugenio Moscon De Faria and others
Defendant:
Honeywell International, Inc., Motorola, Inc., Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Dardengo-v-Honeywell International Inc.
as 3:2010cv04948
Plaintiff:
Jose Angelo Dardengo , Karla Martins dos Santos , Francisco Eugenio Moscon De Faria and others
Defendant:
Honeywell International, Inc. , Motorola, Inc., Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Gomes de Oliveira v. Airbus SAS et al
as 3:2010cv02278
Plaintiff:
Aldair Gomes de Oliveira
Defendant:
Airbus SAS, Airbus Americas, Inc., Airbus Americas Sales, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Airline Crash
In re Air Crash Over the Mid-Atlantic on June 1, 2009
as 3:2010md02144
Plaintiff:
Margita Gergelova, Viktor Gergel, Alia Faroukh and others
Defendant:
Airbus S.A.S., Honeywell International, Inc., Thales Group and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
General Electric Co.
Counter Defendant:
Rosemount Aerospace Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gomes de Oliveira v. Airbus SAS et al
as 1:2010cv20841
Plaintiff:
Aldair Gomes de Oliveira
Defendant:
Airbus SAS, Airbus Americas, Inc., Airbus Americas Sales, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Airline Crash
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
