Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 56
In Re: Rachel Genevieve Powers Trust v. Webb
as 24-1318
Appellant: RACHEL GENEVIEVE POWERS, Trust
Defendant: JEREMIAH DARNELL WEBB, NOAH SENCER ROBERT BARCLAY, MALAKAI LEVI LYNCH and others
Ahmed v. Mayorkas
as 24-1260
Plaintiff: IFTEKHAR AHMED, A 063633249
Defendant: ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, District Director, Albany, New York, UR M. JADDOU, Director, USCIS and others
L v. Decker
as 24-718
Petitioner: J L
Respondent: THOMAS DECKER, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice
Ifeji v. Garland
as 24-484
Defendant: BRETT EISELE, central pinal justice court precinct 3 judge et al., Central Pinal Justice Court Precinct 3 HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, MARIAN BROWN, dallas county sherrif et al., DALLAS COUNTY SHERRIFS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, GLENN HEGAR, texas secretary of state et al., TEXAS COMPTROLLERS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS and others
Plaintiff: JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI, a Mooress beneficiary EMPRESS JAZLIN TRUST A Empress, Admiral, Mariner A, Merchant, Piloter Nations a private Moor aboriginal texan national territory of Spain, JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI ESTATE ET. AL., beneficiary, JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR ESTATE ET AL., beneficiary JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR et al. and others
Muzumala v. Mayorkas
as 24-157
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOSHUA MUZUMALA
Defendant / Appellee: FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, (ICE)
Defendant: ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and TAE JOHNSON, in his official capacity as Director of the U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE)
Barclay v. Dixon
as 24-92
Defendant / Appellee: MAKAYLA COOK, Police Officer, Sandusky Police Department, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Makayla Cook, TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden, Mansfield Correctional Facility, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Tim Mcconahay, ROBERT A. DIXON, Attorney, Attorney at Law, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Robert A. Dixon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: LESHAWN MAURICE BARCLAY, a Moor beneficiary, a Emperor, Admiral, Mariner, Merchant, Piloter a private Moor aboriginal ohioan national, and subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
Motley v. Janae Rocquel Motley Estate
as 24-1
Plaintiff / Appellant: JANAE ROCQUEL MOTLEY
Defendant / Appellee: JANAE ROCQUEL MOTLEY ESTATE, beneficiary JANAE ROCQUEL MOTLEY, DYMARION RASHAD BROOKS ESTATE, beneficiary DYMARION RASHAD BROOKS, DERRION RASHAD BROOKS ESTATE, beneficiary DERRION RASHAD BROOKS and others
Conklin v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 23-8003
Plaintiff / Appellant: PATRICK T. CONKLIN
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Defendant: AFOD FRANZ JEUDY, DFODs SCOTT MECHKOWSKI, DARIUS REEVES and others
Hodge v. Mayorkas
as 23-7988
Petitioner / Appellant: OSVALDO HODGE
Respondent / Appellee: ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, THOMAS BROPHY, in his official capacity as Acting Field Office Director, Buffalo Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-817
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?