Cases 41 - 50 of 86
Ciccotelli v. Stamps.com Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv07246
Plaintiff:
Alex Ciccotelli
Defendant:
Stamps.com Inc., Ken McBride, Mohan P. Ananda and others
CICCOTELLI v. LYDALL INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03784
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant:
LYDALL INC., MARC T. GILES, SARA A GREENSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
CICCOTELLI v. AERPIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03463
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant:
AERPIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., STEVE PRELACK, ANUPAM DALAL and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Ciccotelli v. IEC Electronics Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv01255
Plaintiff:
Alex Ciccotelli
Defendant:
IEC Electronics Corp., Keith M. Butler, Charles P. Hadeed and others
Ciccotelli v. GP Strategies Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv07320
Plaintiff:
Alex Ciccotelli
Defendant:
GP Strategies Corporation, Scott N. Greenberg, Tamar Elkeles and others
CICCOTELLI v. SOLITON, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02843
Defendant:
WALTER V KLEMP, NIQUETTE HUNT, BRAD HAUSER and others
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Ciccotelli v. Translate Bio, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv07060
Plaintiff:
Alex Ciccotelli
Defendant:
Translate Bio, Inc., Ronald C. Renaud, Jr., George Demetri and others
Ciccotelli v. Marlin Business Services Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv05608
Defendant:
Lawrence J. DeAngelo, John J. Calamari, Matthew J. Sullivan and others
Plaintiff:
Alex Ciccotelli
Ciccotelli v. Kansas City Southern et al
as 1:2021cv05800
Plaintiff:
Alex Ciccotelli and Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern, Lydia I. Beebe, Lu M. Cordova and others
Stein v. Kansas City Southern et al
as 1:2021cv05551
Defendant:
Patrick J. Ottensmeyer, Antonio O. Garza, Jr., Lu M. Cordova and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein and Alex Ciccotelli
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Michael James
Consolidated Defendant:
Canadian National Railway Company and Brooklyn Merger Sub, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
