Cases filed in California
Cases 41 - 50 of 91
Del Pino et al v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv03911
Plaintiff: James Del Pino and Beverly I. Del Pino
Defendant: 3M Company, A.W. Chesterton Company, Abb Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dehlbom et al v. ABB Inc, et al
as 2:2012cv05167
Defendant: ABB Inc, Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Alaska Tanker Company LLC and others
Plaintiff: Mary C Cline, David L Dehlbom, Kathryn J Dehlbom and others
Del Pino et al v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv02928
Plaintiff: James Del Pino and Beverly I. Del Pino
Defendant: 3M Company, A.W. Chesterton Company, Abb Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Patrick Osso et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv03248
Defendant: Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc, Armstrong International Inc and others
Plaintiff: Patrick Osso and Wanda Osso
Lee E. Knowles v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv02284
Defendant: A.W. Chesterton Company, Alfa Laval, Inc., Amtrol, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Joyce Knowles and Lee E. Knowles
Swain et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv02168
Defendant: Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc, Amcord Inc and others
Plaintiff: Daniel Swain and Kathy Swain
Marion Cherry et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv01745
Defendant: Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval, Inc., Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Charlotte Cherry and Marion Cherry
The: Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company
Rosalie Jean Nelson v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00811
Ued As Successor-by-merger To Buffalo Pumps, Inc: Air and Liquid Systems Corporation
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To The Delaval Separator Company: Alfa Laval Inc
Ued As Successor-in-interest To Thursh Company And H.A. Thrush Company: Amtrol Inc
Defendant: Armstrong International Inc, CLA-VAL Co, Cameron International Corporation and others
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Chapman Valve Company, Deming Pump Company, Jenkin: Crane Co
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Mundet Cork Company: Crown Cork and Seal Company Inc
Ued As Successor To Sierra Talc Company And United Talc Company: Cyprus Amax Minerals Company
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Northern Pump Company Fka Northern Fire Apparatu: FMC Corporation
Ued As Successor To Edward Valve, Inc: Flowserve US Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Henry Valve Co: Henry Technologies Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Delaval Turbine, Inc., And C.H. Wheeler Manufactur: IMO Industries
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Robertshaw Controls Company Dba Fulton Sylphon Val: Invensys Systems Inc
Plaintiff: Rosalie Jean Nelson
Ued Successor-in-interest To Klipfel Valves, Inc: O C Keckley Company
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To International Talc Company: RT Vanderbilt Company Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Zurn Industries, Inc: Zurn Industries LLC
Nelson et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00793
Defendant: Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc, Amtrol Inc and others
Plaintiff: Rosalie Jean Nelson and Rosalie Jean Nelson
Allen et al v. Flowserve US Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv04495
Plaintiff: Michael Allen and Carla Allen
Defendant: Flowserve US Inc., Ingersoll-Rand Company, Flowserve Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?