Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Higgins, et al.
as 24-1500
Plaintiff: ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES
Defendant: JEANNE HIGGINS, Idaho Panhandle National Forest Supervisor, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Interior
Alliance for the Wild Rockies, et al. v. United States Forest Service, et al.
as 23-3415
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES and NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS COUNCIL
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, RANDY MOORE, MARY ERICKSON and others
Alliance for the Wild Rockies, et al. v. United States Forest Service, et al.
as 23-3059
Plaintiff / Appellee: ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES and NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS COUNCIL
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, RANDY MOORE, MARY ERICKSON and others
Wilderness Watch, et al v. Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, et al
as 23-35577
Plaintiff / Appellee: WILDERNESS WATCH, ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES, GALLATIN WILDLIFE ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF FISH, WILDLIFE AND PARKS
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. American Forest Resource Council, et al
as 23-35568
Plaintiff / Appellee: ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES
Defendant: NATHAN GASSMAN, District Ranger, Kootenai National Forest, Libby Ranger District, CHAD BENSON, Forest Supervisor, Kootenai National Forest, KEITH LANNOM, Deputy Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service Region One and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, LINCOLN COUNTY and KOOTENAI FOREST STAKEHOLDERS COALITION
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Nathan Gassman, et al
as 23-35567
Plaintiff / Appellee: ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES
Defendant / Appellant: NATHAN GASSMAN, District Ranger, Kootenai National Forest, Libby Ranger District, CHAD BENSON, Forest Supervisor, Kootenai National Forest, KEITH LANNOM, Deputy Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service Region One and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, LINCOLN COUNTY and KOOTENAI FOREST STAKEHOLDERS COALITION
Alliance for the Wild Rockies, et al v. State of Idaho, et al
as 23-35451
Plaintiff / Appellee: ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES and NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS COUNCIL
Defendant: HILARY COOLEY, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Grizzly Bear Recovery Coordinator, MARTHA WILLIAMS, Director, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and DEB HAALAND, Secretary, Department of Interior
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: STATE OF IDAHO
Alliance for the Wild Rockies, et al v. Hilary Cooley, et al
as 23-35436
Plaintiff / Appellee: ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES and NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS COUNCIL
Defendant / Appellant: HILARY COOLEY, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Grizzly Bear Recovery Coordinator, MARTHA WILLIAMS, Director, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and DEB HAALAND, Secretary, Department of Interior
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: STATE OF IDAHO
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-35583
Plaintiff / Appellee: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, CONSERVATION NORTHWEST, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
Defendant / Appellant: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, MARTHA WILLIAMS, Principal Deputy Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, in her official capacity and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: STATE OF IDAHO, by and through the Office of Species Conservation and the Idaho Fish and Game Commission
Native Ecosystems Council, et al v. Keith Lannom, et al
as 22-35496
Plaintiff / Appellee: NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS COUNCIL and ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES
Defendant / Appellant: KEITH LANNOM, U.S. Forest Service Deputy Regional Forester and U.S. FOREST SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?