Cases 1 - 3 of 3
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company v. UPA CALIFORNIA et al
as 2:2008at00184
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company
Defendant:
UPA CALIFORNIA, UPA Group, Inc., Amako Resort Construction (U.S.) Inc., a Washington Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company v. UPA California et al
as 2:2008cv00363
Plaintiff:
Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company
Defendant:
UPA California, UPA Group, Inc., Amako Resort Construction (U.S.) Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. UPA California et al
as 3:2008cv00611
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
UPA California, UPA Group, Inc., UPCAL Construction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
