Cases 1 - 10 of 18
WAG Acquisition, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 24-1633
Appellant:
WAG ACQUISITION, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC. and AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
WAG Acquisition, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 24-1634
Appellant:
WAG ACQUISITION, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC. and AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
AlmondNet, Inc. v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 24-1427
Appellant:
ALMONDNET, INC.
Appellee:
META PLATFORMS, INC., AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC. and others
TrackTime, LLC v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 24-1102
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRACKTIME, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC and AUDIBLE, INC.
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON.COM LLC, AMZN MOBILE LLC and others
Amazon.com, Inc. v. Swarm Technology LLC
as 24-1095
Appellant:
AMAZON.COM, INC. and AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC.
Appellee:
SWARM TECHNOLOGY LLC
Swarm Technology LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 23-2323
Appellant:
SWARM TECHNOLOGY LLC
Appellee:
AMAZON.COM, INC. and AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC.
In re: PersonalWeb Technologies LLC
as 23-2181
Plaintiff:
PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AMAZON.COM, INC. and AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
TWITCH INTERACTIVE, INC.
Petitioner / Appellant:
MONTO HOLDINGS PTY LTD., EUROPLAY CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, CLARIA INNOVATIONS, LLC and others
Amazon.com, Inc.In re: Amazon.com, Inc.
as 23-104
Petitioner:
In re: AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC and AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC.
Respondent:
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.
Broadband iTV, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 23-1107
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BROADBAND ITV, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC and AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC.
AlterWAN, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 22-1349
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALTERWAN, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
AMAZON.COM, INC. and AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
