Cases 51 - 57 of 57
Vakhtang Pruidze v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-3836
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL and NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD
Petitioner:
VAKHTANG PRUIDZE
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Ruben Reyes-Torres v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
as 09-70214
Petitioner:
RUBEN REYES-TORRES
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
THE NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAW FOUNDATION and AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL
Milton Trabanino-Ventura v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
as 08-75065
Petitioner:
MILTON ESTUARDO TRABANINO-VENTURA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL and THE NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD
Ruben Reyes-Torres v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
as 08-74452
Petitioner:
RUBEN REYES-TORRES
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL and THE NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAW FOUNDATION
Kazarian v. US Citizenship, et al
as 07-56774
Plaintiff - Appellant:
POGHOS KAZARIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, a Bureau of the Department of Homeland Security and JOHN DOES, 1 through 10
Amicus Curiae:
ASSOCIATION OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATORS, NAFSA and THE AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL, American Immigration Council
Mejia-Hernandez, et al v. Holder
as 07-74277
Petitioner:
BERNARDINO EDUARDO MEJIA-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL
Rosillo-Puga v. Holder, Jr.
as 07-9564
Petitioner:
MARTIN ROSILLO-PUGA, AKA Martin Puga, AKA Martin Rosillo
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General
Amicus Curiae:
THE AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAW FOUNDATION, AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL and NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
