Cases 41 - 50 of 241
PURCELL et al v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv07041
Plaintiff:
MARGARET PURCELL and DAVID D. PURCELL, SR.
Defendant:
AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. , BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. , SECANT MEDICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOORE v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv06950
Plaintiff:
RONNA MOORE
Defendant:
AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. , ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DELAZERDA et al v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2013cv06755
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA DELAZERDA and MICHAEL DELAZERDA
Defendant:
AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HANNUM v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2013cv06754
Plaintiff:
JOAN HANNUM
Defendant:
AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MACKEY et al v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2013cv06546
Plaintiff:
JULIA MACKEY and RICHARD W. ASHTON
Defendant:
AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YOUNG-ALEXANDER v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2013cv06547
Plaintiff:
MARY YOUNG-ALEXANDER
Defendant:
AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MOORE et al v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2013cv06545
Plaintiff:
GERTRUDE MOORE and JACK MOORE
Defendant:
AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KRONER v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2013cv06548
Plaintiff:
REBECCA KRONER and WAYNE KRONER
Defendant:
AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KLEBA v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2013cv06320
Plaintiff:
JANE KLEBA
Defendant:
AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CONTRARAS v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2013cv06323
Plaintiff:
MARIA ELENA CONTRARAS
Defendant:
AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
