Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Sparrow v. American River Transportation Co.
as 1:2011cv09053
Plaintiff:
Roy Sparrow
Defendant:
American River Transportation Co.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
City Of Chicago v. Motor Vessel Dale White et al
as 1:2010cv05270
Plaintiff:
City Of Chicago
Defendant:
Motor Vessel Dale White and American River Transportation Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Edmiston v. American River Transportation Co.
as 1:2010cv01030
Plaintiff:
Richard Edmiston and Richard Edmiston
Defendant:
American River Transportation Co.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Gifford v. American River Transportation Company
as 3:2009cv00796
Plaintiff:
Doris M. Gifford
Defendant:
American River Transportation Company
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Duty v. American River Transportation Company
as 3:2009cv00693
Plaintiff:
Herman Duty
Defendant:
American River Transportation Company
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1101 Violation of Maritime Regulations
Herget v. American River Transportation Co.
as 1:2009cv00531
Plaintiff:
August Herget and August Herget
Defendant:
American River Transportation Co.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Butcher v. American River Transportation Company
as 3:2009cv00060
Plaintiff:
Barbara Butcher
Defendant:
American River Transportation Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stewart v. Archer Daniels Midland Company/American River Transportation Company
as 3:2008cv00906
Plaintiff:
Bill Stewart
Defendant:
Archer Daniels Midland Company/American River Transportation Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stevens v. American River Transportation Co.
as 1:2008cv06827
Plaintiff:
Chad Stevens and Chad Stevens
Defendant:
American River Transportation Co.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv05379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
